CarsDirect review: 2014 Scion iQ

Like with the CarsDirect Ford Focus review I posted before, the Scion iQ review was written to give an overview of the car and its changes over the years, different model variations (of which there technically are none), and cars which one might also look at.

Here’s the original text I sent in.

Scion’s diminutive iQ model reaches it’s third production year for 2014, with little changes.  There are less colors available for 2014 than the 2013 model, and a few minor options and accessories missing as well (so long, cargo tote— car collectors write that down).  Also noted for collectors, all Scions celebrate the tenth anniversary of the Toyota branch with a special “Silver Ignition” paint, and an adornment of lighting fixtures inside and outside of the vehicles.

Inside the iQ, you find that the four seats are more like three and a shelf.  Exterior size being a great way to fool a passer-by, a six-foot passenger with a 32-inch inseam (important, as not all 6-footers are alike) can sit in the one useable back seat with an equally proportioned six-footer directly in front of them.  This is acceptable at least around town.  This party trick is due in part to the engine being mounted farther forward of the front wheels than usual, thus putting the front passenger slightly ahead of the driver.  Another way Toyota’s youth division accomplished this feat was removing the conventional glove-box in the dash, in favor of a hidden slide-out drawer under the front passenger seat.

With more clever engineering, the Scion kills two map-lights with one swiveling LED lamp, letting whoever needs the illumination have it.  The iQ also has a surprisingly supple leather-wrapped steering wheel; welcome in this class and $16,000 price point.

The iQ is a single-trim vehicle, but can be optioned out with two sets of wheel covers for the standard 16” steel wheels, or for about $700 one can adorn their car with swanky 16” aluminum wheels, though the 175mm wide tires remain the same.  Foglights can also be equipped, and for those wanting a little more fun with their iQ there’s even Toyota Racing Development (TRD) sway bars and springs that lower and stiffen the car.

Like before, the iQ commences down the road via a 1.3L inline-four good for 94 surprisingly growly horses, and 89 foot-pounds of torque.  Making the best of that power is a CVT transmission.  While no rocket ship, the iQ does get along well enough in town, and the fuel economy ratings are nearly matching each other for city/highway with 36/37 EPA ratings.

Chevy Spark
The only city-car in America sold with rear doors, the Spark adds convenience competitors don’t.  Spark gives a choice of manual or automatic transmission while most hold to just automated.  Weaknesses include not being the most powerful in the class, and economy is good but with wider gap for consumption ratings compared to some smaller competitors.

The Alternatives

Fiat 500
The 500 is the powerhouse of the city cars, with a 101-horsepower engine.  It also stands out as the cute one out of more aggressively angled small cars with more pumped up fenders.  Regardless of the power, the 500 still yields good fuel economy and choices between a manual or automatic transmission.

Toyota Yaris
A big brother of the Scion iQ, the Yaris has similar equipment in a larger package.  It lacks the tight turning circle or better city mpg, but the highway mpg matches the iQ, and is more at home on the open road for those who find themselves out of town more often.

smart fortwo
The fortwo is the grandparent for this class.  The similar Scion iQ seats more people, and regardless of more power and size, the iQ still bests the Smart for turning circle and economy—the Smart also requires premium fuel.  Fortwo’s tight exterior size still wins for parking, but it’s not just the all-lowercase name that makes the smart seem not-so.

Advertisements

Cars and film: Some of my favorite disappointments


(Image from “How it should have ended: Fast 6”)

Hollywood loves to play with cars.  Blow ’em up, slide them, crash them, whatever.  It’s entertaining to people.

What gets to me is when they’re so wrong or inaccurate in things, as though there aren’t enough of us to consult to make it… well, better. When Hollywood gets stuff wrong, it puts us car-guys going into fits for yeeeeaaars (the The Fast and the Furious of 2001 was enough for us, let alone another five after it– excuse the CanHazCheezbugerz writing of Wiki).

First, the reason I’m even posting this, is the Need for Speed movie, based off the once  popular game series.  Heck, I played Need for Speed 2 all the way until Porsche Unleashed and Hot Pursuit 2 (the latter on PC).  After that, I gave up for the likes of Playstation’s Gran Turismo and xBox 360’s Forza.  But just because these games sell well, doesn’t mean they should be turned into movies.

^It’s movies like this that create atheists, because a higher power wouldn’t allow such things to occur.  It’s right there with hurricanes and genocide.  When a “yo mama” joke is inserted into the trailer, you’re in some very serious shit…  I laughed so hard my soul is broken.

These are just a few of the films or scenes that I particularly want to share.

RPM
Back in 1998, there was a similarly bad-acted B-movie (redundant?) called RPM, starring David Arquette (see “redundant”).  In fact, the star characters between RPM and Need for Speed uncannily similar in look, which considering the 15 year gap is a bad sign, especially when the Y2K-encroached film already screamed more 1993 than New Millennium.

Just for a taste of what Bollywood gives us for entertainment, and I’m hoping is more camp than serious.

Driven
Here’s a fun scene from a movie I didn’t even finish.  The movie Driven from the late 1990’s or early 2000’s– I’m not bothered looking of which– was about formula driving… or indy cars… something like that.  Doesn’t matter, it was bad.

Things to note, here:
-There’s no way you would be able to hear someone at those speeds just from the wind rush, let alone a super-loud, high revving engine in a tunnel.
-This should be their faces:

-Cars like that generally don’t just “start.”  The pit crew more or less cranks them, and even then that’s after pumping hot oil and coolants through the not-running engine in order to prepare it.  They are very tight tolerances, and without optimizing the lubrication and temperatures, that engine will be pissed.
-Apparently, every hum-drum front-drive commuter and luxury barge in Chicago is prone so professional-grade oversteer when the steering wheel is yanked.  Need to see understeer and oversteer?
<p><a href=”http://vimeo.com/59415579″>Toyota GT86 @ TopGear</a> from <a href=”http://vimeo.com/benistus”>Benistus</a&gt; on <a href=”https://vimeo.com”>Vimeo</a&gt;.</p>
-After they get out of their cars, note how one of them just throws that steering-wheel out of the car.  I guarantee that steering wheel is worth somewhere around $10,000-20,000 because of the materials, engineering, and technology put through it.

The best scene was probably early in.

Drive

That got me and fellow car friends excited– seeing a black Hemi-powered Chrysler hauling after a Mustang GT (the new-at-the-time come-back for the 5.0L badge) had me imagining an automotive icon reminiscent of Bullitt.*

Then I rented it… oh deary me.

Here it starts off in a silver Impala SS… boring looking, but quick enough in a straight line, but no getaway car.  Gosling does anything but portray a professional driver, and instead sits more like a cruiser or someone who watches The Fast and the Furious as an example of how driving is done… which it isn’t.  Show me any real professional racer that drives with one hand at 12 o’clock (or 1 o’clock with a left hand, or 10 o’clock with right hand– whatever extreme).  That’s not car control folks, even if he eventually choked up to a slightly better grip once the fuzz caught on.  What’s more: a silver Impala in L.A.– there’s nothing odd about that.  Rental fleets LOVED these cars.  Why did he have to confirm “yup, I’m the one you’re looking for!”  Pull into a McDonalds drive-thru or step into a Holiday Inn like any tourist would and remove suspicion.  To make matters worse, they were going WOT in this torque-steer monster Impala in wet city streets with little lost in speed, more gears than the car had, and what sounded like manual shifting.  That’s only the first scene.

What Drive actually was, minus some stabbing and Christina Hendrix’s head turning to Jello, was this:

Why did they bother?

*To be fair, Bullitt is a very dry, quiet movie.  Steve McQueen was an actor who used facial expressions rather than dialog… stares.  Yes, Bullitt been revered as one of the best car movies ever, but that seven minute chase is just a small bit of the film.  It’s confusing initially, and really takes some attention and appreciation to see it outside just the chase.  I highly suggested watching all of Bullitt without commentary, and then again with commentary, as it brings out a lot more of the film and what was going on at the time as it explains the stares.

The difference between the stares of Bullitt and Drive is McQueen was a master of the art, and aimed for realism and subtle points of social structure of the 1960’s.  Ryan Gosling, on the other hand, was thrown in with a different director and intention, making Drive more blank and awkward rather than a conveyance of emotion.  Culminate that with a horribly 1980’s jacket for that touch of not-quite Hipster, and you lose me.

If there’s a car movie you love to hate, feel free to comment and share.  There are plenty out there!

Poll: Should we bring “boxed fenders” to dull side profiles?

Do you ever look at the way cars of recent years do the side styling of their cars?  Big, round front fenders with a line that runs off to the back, but nothing more than a slight rounding over the rear wheels?  Maybe you’ll see it now, if you hadn’t already.

Often times with cars of the 1980’s, ‘90’s, and even the 2000’s got sported up, part of the treatment was box fenders—it helped allow for wider wheels and tires.  A good example of a “plain” model against the fast would be the commonly revered BMW 3-Series E30 coupe which, in M3 guise, featured those sharp creases in the metal to help beef it up.

More modern sport-compacts to do this last were the Mitsubishi Lancers, which the Lancer Evolution vastly improved the aggressive looks of.

There’s no need to limit the boxed fenders to the performance models, either—especially for the rear of the vehicles.  Subaru had boxed fenders on all the 2001-2007 Impreza models.

While perhaps a biased statement as an owner, I have a whole new appreciation for the Toyota Echo and the crease over the rear fender.  It’s actually quite a small protrusion, as you can’t even make it out in the photo below.
IMG_1261
However, when the light hits that slight jut in just the right way, it creates a much welcome break in what would be an even more awkward panel.
IMG_1372

Look at all the current entries in the subcompact and compact classes of automobile, and you’ll find them absent as these examples show:



Even performance brands like BMW’s 1M Coupe have long gone without boxed flares.

Wouldn’t those look better with a strake over the rear arches than a minimal bubble?  Thank goodness the Lancer Evolution still does it.  Apparently so does the Honda Fit (partially) and (not pictured) Audi RS5.

All photos from WikiCommons, save for my Echo and the red Lancer Evo RS which links to the original page.

Could the current (NC) Mazda MX5 be the last of the proper Miata’s?

Any car guy that “gets it” knows that the Miata is the answer for many enthusiasts looking for a inexpensive, fairly reliable, common, good-performing car with a large aftermarket to boot.  If you’d rather see the Miata as gay/an old womans car, this post isn’t for you.  Otherwise, the Miata is a car that ended the reign of what would become (at least to me) one of the most over-lived poser mobiles to grace the American market: the Alfa Romeo Spider.  The funny thing is, the MX5 and Alfa Romeo Spider (if you haven’t already heard) will be co-developed between Alfa and Mazda to lower costs, much like the Subaru/Toyota/Scion BRZ/GT86/FRS… that’s the worry.

There’s no doubt in my mind the car I only acknowledge as “Subaru BRZ” is a true enthusiast vehicle.  I’ve seen them two out of three times I’ve been to Thunderhill Raceway (not even the same car), and I can’t go for a fun mountain drive without seeing at least one owner enjoying the same drive I am.  Rather my concern is that the Miata/Spider connection will somehow water down what made the Miata such a special car.

The little Mazda didn’t need a movie with Dustin Hoffman stalking a girl in San Francisco to make it a success, and the Alfa Spider did (also note: hoodies date back that far).  Why else did the Spider live in such a relatively archaic state until 1993?  The common “Alfa Romeo Graduate” nomenclature should be enough to make my point.  The old Duetto Spider was a great car in the 1960’s and was part of a dying breed in the 1970’s and ‘80’s (thanks to the VW Golf GTi), but the mid 1990’s?  They changed very little underneath from the 1966 origins, making for a nostalgia piece rather than a modern drivers car.  At least the Duetto had four wheel disks and avoided leaf springs (I’m looking at you MGB’s). Come the Mazda-copy of the Lotus Elan, the Miata injected a hint of reliability and build quality (the roof worked for more than just shade) and the Alfa Spider soon disappeared.  Indeed Alfa as a company left the American market until now soon eventually with the 4c.

Sharing a platform doesn’t mean the Alfa RoMiata will be a simple cut/paste rebadged and a slight change in rear sway bars (I hear the BRZ has a larger rear sway than the FRS). Instead both companies will use different engines to say the least.  Still, there’s that inkling of not bespoke that the new Miata will have.  At least the NC Miata (the third generation that came out around 2004) shared some platform and chassis pieces with the RX8, which was still in-house.  The distinct Mazda-ness of the car remained.

“Come the Mazda-copy of the Lotus Elan, they injected a hint of reliability and build quality (the roof worked for more than just shade) and the Alfa Spider soon disappeared.  Indeed Alfa as a company left the American market until now soon eventually with the 4c.”

Not only is the brand split of the platform a possible downer, but the prospect that the Miata has done.  A lot of what the Miata purity could accomplish since its inception have been so whittled down by regulations or trends: power steering makes it easier, air conditioning and power-everything more comfortable to live with, ABS and stability/traction control for required safety and so on.  Popular Mechanics put out a list of “10 Great Analog Sportscars” that highlighted just how long the Miata had put off things like power steering, anti-lock brakes, and traction/stability control as standard equipment for the sake of remaining a pure drive.  The only other car on that list that is still produced in the Viper, which may be a brutishly fast car, but doesn’t have that same finesse that makes the Miata such an instant classic.

We shall see if the Miata still rules the roost, as the BRZ seems a compelling competitor for the Miata for not using the exact same two-seat, I-4, convertible recipe so many companies failed-n-bailed with.  Now that the Mazda and Alfa may remove some of the distinction, only the long wait until they are finally done can tell if the Miata remains an honest-sportscar king.